Diplomatic Immunity Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Diplomatic franchise - Essay Example to that degree because of ambiguities in the interpretation of the said international agreement, abuses of diplomatic immunities have become inevitable. These abuses of power and privilege twine from petty crimes like traffic violations and debt to more serious crimes of conspiracy, rape, and murder. Because of this, efforts to clarify the extent and provisions of Diplomatic Immunity should take place. This paper will then attempt to provide suggestions on how to resolve and prevent abuses of diplomatic immunities.Diplomatic unsusceptibility, as agreed upon by the standards of international law, is a form of legal exemption all-embracing to a provinces diplomats. This entitles the diplomats and their immediate families to be exempted from the laws and local courts of the host country. Some of the general provisions of diplomatic immunity guarantee that the diplomats and their immediate families may not be arrested or detained, may not have their residences entered or searched, may not be subpoenaed as witnesses, and may not be prosecuted. (eDiplomat, 2006)The 1958 Yearbook of International integrity Commission, as cited in Vrk (2003), mentions three theories about the legal bases of diplomatic immunity. ... ntatives of a sending state, the diplomats should also be given the same independence as a receiving state would have negotiated with the sending state itself. These cardinal theories, of course, have long been deduced to legal fictions with all the faulty assumptions. The accepted theory behind diplomatic immunity now lies in the theory of functional necessity. This theory is based on the need of diplomatic missions and diplomats to expeditiously perform their duties and responsibilities according to what their country requires from them, without apprehensions of being criminally charged by the receiving state. For instance, diplomats are able to begin unfounded penal proceedings without hindrances from the rec eiving state because of diplomatic immunity. According to eDiplomat (2006), Diplomatic immunity is not meant to service individuals personally it is meant to ensure that foreign officials can do their jobs. Under the concept of reciprocity, diplomats assigned to any country in the world benefit equally from diplomatic immunity. This assumption that diplomatic immunity would be inversely observed between sovereign states justifies the seemingly biased scales of justice. The rationale why countries agree to be certified on a foreign countrys decision before prosecuting a diplomat in their consume grunge is based on the fact that these countries are both receiving and sending diplomats. This means that they also have their own diplomats immunity at stake in different countries across the globe. It is clearly stated in the preamble of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations that the purpose of such privileges and immunities is not to benefit individuals exclusively to ensure the efficient performance of the functions of diplomatic missions as representing